Go Back   Ayonae.com Forums > Things that happen outside > Real Life Issues

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-02-2004   #1
Esbat
Overlord of Mutual Confusion
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Party: Independent
Posts: 862
vCash: 1000
Default Dead is dead

So, I came across this article HERE. Go read it.

I'd seen this man's work before on the Discovery channel- I find it amazing.

The process in the article is outlined in depth HERE All in all, it is a pretty amazing process. It is also new- nothing like this has been done before. The ancient Egyptians would have had a hard on for this process.


However, as noted in the article, there is some outrage about his subject matter. It seems that they think it violates the sanctity of the human body, or that is was "amoral, and insulting to the dead". I disagree- I think the real reason it disturbs people is that a visual representation of death, up close and personal is more than some people can handle.

Why?
The burial customs of religions/cultures differ wildly. What is commonplace in one area (such as throwing bodies into the Ganges and letting them float off to rot) is unthinkable in others. The practice of embalming the dead that is common in the US offends the sensibilities of the Jewish and Muslim people.

Obviously, the religious aspect of this could be covered in depth, but I'm not trying to take it there. Suffice it to say that religion will impact what someone considers "acceptable" in terms of burial practice.

I'm more interested in:
- Everyone's thoughts on the process
- If it is a method anyone here might consider for post-mortem treatment.
- If the depiction of death is what might cause the most discomfort to most people
__________________
Esbat Unseelie
As friendly, diplomatic and tactful as a bullet in flight.
Esbat is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 07-02-2004   #2
Ibudin
Don't Piss off the BULL.
 
Ibudin's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 2,406
vCash: 1000
Default

Its pretty strange to me but to each his own.
Ibudin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004   #3
Sanchek
Administrator
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Location: Atlanta
Party: Independent
Posts: 7,685
vCash: 900
Default

Seems sort of like a cross between the nudity and violence taboos that most cultures have at least one of. Probably another reason it's so controversial. No matter where you come from, it probably seems wrongish somehow.
Sanchek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004   #4
Windsurfer001
Flamboyant Minstrel
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 35
vCash: 1000
Default

w... t... f... some people ill never understand
Windsurfer001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004   #5
Mukaz
Master of Squirrels
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 188
vCash: 1000
Default

What's not to understand?

"Intended to teach people about human skeletal, cardiovascular and other systems, the final exhibit includes 25 bodies that have undergone a process called 'plastination' in which body fluids are replaced with clear, pliable plastic."

If these displays were put up but no one was told they were actual cadavers would it be as controversial?
Mukaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004   #6
Gulor Gularin
Retired Paladin
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: Colorado
Party: Independent
Posts: 985
vCash: 900
Default

Probably not...because people would assume they were simply models and therefore most religious objections would not apply. It is the fact these are cadavers and not just constructs that is freaking people out.

Personally I find the exhibit distasteful. The place to learn about anatomy is in medical school, not a public exhibit. It seems to me to pander to the worst morbidity of people (ooh! look at the dead guys!) and not to a genuine desire to learn anatomy.
Gulor Gularin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004   #7
Prezto
Diabolical Neophyte
 
Prezto's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 303
vCash: 1000
Default

Quote:
Personally I find the exhibit distasteful. The place to learn about anatomy is in medical school, not a public exhibit. It seems to me to pander to the worst morbidity of people (ooh! look at the dead guys!) and not to a genuine desire to learn anatomy.
I suppose then that it is just as distasteful to have cross-sectioned human bodies on exhibit at the Johnson Space Center in Houston. I thought they were pretty neat but then again I was only 10.
__________________
Prezto - Undead Rogue
Prezton - Undead Priest
Elegy
Elune
Prezto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004   #8
Mukaz
Master of Squirrels
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 188
vCash: 1000
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gulor Gularin
Personally I find the exhibit distasteful. The place to learn about anatomy is in medical school, not a public exhibit. It seems to me to pander to the worst morbidity of people (ooh! look at the dead guys!) and not to a genuine desire to learn anatomy.
There have been plenty of displays in science and natural history museums that expose the inner workings of the human body.

When I was a child I remember going to an exhibit at the Benjamin Franklin Institute in Philadelphia and part of the tour was an enourmous model of the human heart designed to be walked through (all 4 chambers) with placards and pictures of the real thing scattered throughout.

Why should only medical students be permitted to learn about human anatomy in detail? You seem to imply that anyone interested learning about the human body that isn't a medical student has baser motives rather than a genuine interest.

So what makes it distasteful to you? Simply the knowledge that the displays are from actual human bodies?
Mukaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004   #9
Thormir
Decaying Deity of Misconceptions
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Party: N/A
Posts: 3,811
vCash: 1000
Default

I think anything that raises scientific awareness in the general public is good. However, information on the exhibit should make it clear from the start that these are cadavers; it shouldn't be a fact thrown at people halfway through the tour. It's terrific that people donate their bodies for such efforts; perhaps it will encourage viewers to donate their blood and bodies for more applied medical purposes (or maybe it will have the opposite effect).

Morbid? I suppose. Useful? I think so. Distasteful? Only if brought to your doorstep at dinnertime. But then, I spent years pulling parts out of dead bodies; it doesn't have much affect on me.
Thormir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2004   #10
Cados Evilsbane
Lightloch.com
 
Cados Evilsbane's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: AL, USA
Party: Republican
Posts: 1,046
vCash: 4000
Default

Hmm, I dunno. That 1 picture really bothers me for some reason. Not sure I'd want to see this if I was in the area.
__________________
Cados Evilsbane is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reagan is dead LummusL Real Life Issues 3 06-15-2004 02:19 AM
Computers dead Larkious General Discussion 7 04-15-2004 06:44 PM
PHINIGEL DEAD ThePerfectFlaw NAG (Nearly Anything Goes) 16 11-22-2003 06:20 PM
DING DONG SADAAMS SONS ARE DEAD.... Bachfu Real Life Issues 90 08-04-2003 08:36 PM
The Dead Sea Scrolls Wardaorm Real Life Issues 26 08-01-2003 02:47 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forum SEO by Zoints