Bush tells Dems war denial is dangerous

By JENNIFER LOVEN
Associated Press Writer

http://hosted.ap.org/photos/3/38576849-76d2-4b18-94d6-6ad87f3ba163-small.jpg (http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/photos/3/38576849-76d2-4b18-94d6-6ad87f3ba163.html?SITE=FLPET&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT)
AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais Watch Related Video http://hosted.ap.org/video/1101dv_bush_terror.jpg (http://video.ap.org/vws/search/aspx/ap.aspx?t=m318&p=ENAPus_ENAPus&f=FLPET&g=1101dv_bush_terror)
Bush: 'Americans Must Remember We Are at War' (http://video.ap.org/vws/search/aspx/ap.aspx?t=m318&p=ENAPus_ENAPus&f=FLPET&g=1101dv_bush_terror)

[/url]
tcdacmd="cc=wdn; dt";
AP_Tacoda_AMS_DDC_addPair("SECTION", "POLITICS") AP_Tacoda_AMS_DDC("http://te.ap.org/tte/blank.gif", "1.0") http://te.ap.org/tte/blank.gif?0.17185468578720575&snippet_version=1.3.a&referrer=http%3A//www.ap.org/&page=http%3A//hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BUSH%3FSITE%3DFLPET%26SECTION%3DHOME%26TEMPLATE%3D DEFAULT&timezone=420&clist_TID=00g3iga13icu3c&var_SECTION=POLITICS

var urlArray=document.URL.split("?"); document.write("
");


WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush compared Congress' Democratic leaders Thursday to people who ignored the rise of Lenin and Hitler early in the last century, saying "the world paid a terrible price" then and risks similar consequences for inaction today.

Bush accused Congress of stalling important pieces of the fight to prevent new terrorist attacks by: dragging out and possibly jeopardizing confirmation of Michael Mukasey as attorney general, a key part of his national security team; failing to act on a bill governing eavesdropping on terrorist suspects; and moving too slowly to approve spending measures for the Iraq war, Pentagon and veterans programs.

"Unfortunately, on too many issues, some in Congress are behaving as if America is not at war," Bush said during a speech at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. "This is no time for Congress to weaken the Department of Justice by denying it a strong and effective leader. ... It's no time for Congress to weaken our ability to intercept information from terrorists about potential attacks on the United States of America. And this is no time for Congress to hold back vital funding for our troops as they fight al-Qaida terrorists and radicals in Afghanistan and Iraq."

Bush's remarks were his second in two days alleging inaction on Capitol Hill, which has been led by Democrats since January. This speech focused on measures related to the war on terror, while Wednesday's emphasized disputes between the White House and Congress over domestic issues.

Bush argued the current debate over the Iraq war and the administration's anti-terror methods harkens back to debates decades ago over resisting action when Soviet founder Vladimir Lenin first talked about launching a communist revolution, when Adolf Hitler began moves to establish an "Aryan superstate" in Germany, and in the early days of the Cold War when some advocated accommodation of the Soviet Union.

"Now we're at the start of a new century, and the same debate is once again unfolding, this time regarding my policy in the Middle East," Bush said. "Once again, voices in Washington are arguing that the watchword of the policy should be stability."

Bush said any denial of war is dangerous.

"History teaches us that underestimating the words of evil, ambitious men is a terrible mistake," Bush said. "Bin Laden and his terrorist allies have made their intentions as clear as Lenin and Hitler before them. And the question is, will we listen?"

Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-.N.Y., running for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, took issue with Bush's comparisons.

"George Bush's faulty and offensive historical analogies aren't going to end the war in Iraq, make America safer or bring our troops home," she said in a statement. "Americans are tired of the president's efforts to play politics with national security and practice the politics of division."

Congress earned Bush's scorn even while he offered praise because a key Senate committee has passed a new eavesdropping bill containing many provisions the president wants. "It's an important step in the right direction," he said.

Bush repeated earlier criticisms of a move to combine spending bills for the Defense Department and veterans programs with one for labor, health and education matters that Republicans consider bloated. Bush also lamented that his emergency spending request for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan still languishes.

"When it comes to funding our troops, some in Washington should spend more time responding to the warnings of terrorists like Osama bin Laden and the requests of our commanders on the ground," Bush said, "and less time responding to the demands of MoveOn.org bloggers and Code Pink protesters."


[url]http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BUSH?SITE=FLPET&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT (http://img.video.ap.org/p/s/sm_vrt_search.swf)

Yea so what?

Just news!

Yes, the world paid a terrible price for ignoring the rise of lunatic leaders and hopefully the elections in 2008 will minimize somewhat the price we are paying this time around.

I heard some sound bites from this speech, and could not help but laugh that the man whose methods have been compared to those used by Hitler in his rise would now try to berate others for not blindly following whatever and wherever he wanted.

Bush is doing everything he can to spin the inaction by this Congress without any mention of his own vetoes and threatened vetoes of anything he opposes. He continues to make partisan politics the daily norm, and is quick to point fingers to lay blame on others.

The only thing he said that really rang true was this:

"History teaches us that underestimating the words of evil, ambitious men is a terrible mistake."

I believe the American people have long since stopped underestimating the words of Bush and Cheney.

Byl, is he really doing anything so different than the politicians before him?
I mean if you had asked Richard Nixon about his Presidency, do you think he would have highlighted the Watergate Scandal?
He probably would have focused the conversation on his opening trade relationships with China.

If you would have asked Gerald Ford about his presidency, he would have probably focused on whatever positives he did rather than pardoning Nixon.

Jimmy Carter would gloss over the Iranian Hostage crisis, and focus on his domestic leadership qualities during the gas crisis.

Reagan would ignore the Iran-Contra scandal, and focused on the ending of the Cold War.

Bush Sr would have highlighted his leadership through the first Gulf War, rather than the death knell of his presidency "read my lips."

Clinton would ignore the Monica Lewinski issue, and focus on the balancing of the budget.

So, if you have to point your finger at this President, and claim he's spinning the issues at hand, you have to point at all of the past presidents.
No one likes admitting they have made a mistake, least of all the President of the Unites States.