Haloface
12-05-2007, 06:29 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7127194.stm
- Fascinating indeed.
Though I wince at the naming of Clarendon as a "henchman", to see this argument played out using such precedent will be, uh, entertaining.
Anywho, more seriously, what will this ruling mean, do you think? For most people G-Bay represents all that is ugly in the post-9/11 world, while others believe it's the USA's right for their defence against terrorism.
The collapse of the latter's argument could have some significant ramifications.
- Fascinating indeed.
Though I wince at the naming of Clarendon as a "henchman", to see this argument played out using such precedent will be, uh, entertaining.
Anywho, more seriously, what will this ruling mean, do you think? For most people G-Bay represents all that is ugly in the post-9/11 world, while others believe it's the USA's right for their defence against terrorism.
The collapse of the latter's argument could have some significant ramifications.