Malse
07-11-2009, 04:22 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/11/us/11nsa.html?_r=1&ref=us
The report found that the secrecy surrounding the program may have limited its effectiveness. At the C.I.A., it said, so few working-level officers were allowed to know about the program that the agency often did not make full use of the leads the wiretapping generated, and intelligence leads that came from the wiretapping operation were often “vague or without context,” the report said.
Illegal? Check. Ineffective? Check. Hampered by its own attempted concealment due to prior? Check. Huge waste of taxpayer money? Check. Deliberate violation of Constitution? Check.
How many times do we have to go through this before someone, anyone pick up on policing techniques that both work and are legal having proven far more effective and calls criminals like Cheney out on it? Meanwhile the NSA is a building two more major listening posts to canvas the entire world for terrorists after having watched the Bourne Supremacy one too many times.
The report found that the secrecy surrounding the program may have limited its effectiveness. At the C.I.A., it said, so few working-level officers were allowed to know about the program that the agency often did not make full use of the leads the wiretapping generated, and intelligence leads that came from the wiretapping operation were often “vague or without context,” the report said.
Illegal? Check. Ineffective? Check. Hampered by its own attempted concealment due to prior? Check. Huge waste of taxpayer money? Check. Deliberate violation of Constitution? Check.
How many times do we have to go through this before someone, anyone pick up on policing techniques that both work and are legal having proven far more effective and calls criminals like Cheney out on it? Meanwhile the NSA is a building two more major listening posts to canvas the entire world for terrorists after having watched the Bourne Supremacy one too many times.