Haloface
06-20-2007, 02:26 AM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/6220786.stm
- I think it's a positive new role for Australia. Well, new in the sense of actively promoting and achieving a more intervensionist role in world affairs. Because of course Australia has been sending troops abroad since the Boer War, and its contribution to both world wars, for its population, was incredible, topped only by New Zealand.
But such a boost to its Navy would mean that it could fullfill its role in the Pacific far better, which I think is having a positive impact, or could definately lead to one.
Not sure why Thailand would be so jittery, though. It's hardly like they have political interests in East Timor, ie.
- I think it's a positive new role for Australia. Well, new in the sense of actively promoting and achieving a more intervensionist role in world affairs. Because of course Australia has been sending troops abroad since the Boer War, and its contribution to both world wars, for its population, was incredible, topped only by New Zealand.
But such a boost to its Navy would mean that it could fullfill its role in the Pacific far better, which I think is having a positive impact, or could definately lead to one.
Not sure why Thailand would be so jittery, though. It's hardly like they have political interests in East Timor, ie.