Nydia Ywalmoriel
07-05-2007, 05:31 AM
I just had to share this from today's San Antonio Express-News, as I laughed and choked on my entomatadas this evening when I read it - but on the more serious side, it's not an isolated incident:
Three National Guard servicemen, sent down here as part of the 'surge' in border enforcement, were arrested with twenty-eight(!) illegal immigrants in an official van, in a sting last month - they were indicted today and the incident finally published to the local papers here. They were only caught because they had been shuttling illegals through the I-35 checkpoint for at least two months, taking them from Laredo to Cotulla or San Antonio; when one was working at the checkpoint, one of the others would bring the van through the service lane and pretend to be discussing official business, or bringing lunch, to him, and then go on through without inspection.
Getting *into* Laredo via one of its five international bridges is trivial, as foot and motor traffic of thousands of Mexican nationals occurs every day as part of everyday life in our single city separated by an international border; but even felons and other other undesirables can skirt scrutiny by getting someone to smuggle them through Customs via a similar arrangement (and occasionally Customs agents are busted for this as well, but more often for allowing drugs across).
Unfortunately, the SA Express-News doesn't have the article posted, but I did find something from the Houston paper online regarding yesterday's indictment:
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/4943122.html
Some details of how the transactions went down, including excerpts of the text messages, the three officers were exchanging, can be found in the Ft. Worth Star Telegram initial report on the arrests:
http://www.star-telegram.com/news/story/133693.html
The three soldiers used cell phone text messaging to negotiate the details, price and number of people who would be smuggled north, according to a complaint filed in court Monday."tell them ill only do 1 run @ no more than 20 people @ $150 a person and i want 2 leave @ 1930 hrs and ill go 2 San Anto if they want," Torres typed to Hodge hours before Torres was arrested, according to the complaint.
A message later that day from Pacheco instructed Torres that a trip was a go, with a promised payment of $3,500 for the delivery of 24 illegal immigrants, the document said.
"24 will b tuff 2 fit but ill try," Torres wrote in response, the complaint said.
More interesting is the additional information included in the Austin American-Statesman in the initial report on the arrests:
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/06/13/13texasimmig.html
Such arrests weren't isolated cases. Since the 2004 fiscal year, according to the inspector general's office in the Homeland Security Department, 282 employees of Customs and Border Protection working on the border from California to Texas have been investigated for corruption, 52 of them this year, compared with 66 for all of last year.
Considering that the overwhelming majority of enforcement personnel stationed here at the border hail from the border region themselves (which tends to have a sanguine attitude with regard to illegal immigration, many residents having family on both sides of the border), and that politics and city managements down here tend to be modelled on the 'patron' system and highly corrupt, this comes as little surprise - I've frequently remarked that we have such a high proportion of the population in some branch of law enforcement that *everyone* is either on one side or other of the law - and often within the same family :).
I believe I also mentioned a while back that the 'fence' that Mr. Chertoff and his lackeys posed in front of, and which is going in down here, is a total joke - laughably flimsy and they're not even clearing the brush in front of them :). While I wholeheartedly support *sincere* efforts to increase interdiction at the border, it also seems quite clear that such efforts are going to be largely ineffectual as long as there are such incentives for people to migrate across - no matter how much we spend on border enforcement, as long as the risk vs reward for people once they have arrived here is minimal (as previously mentioned, it's ridiculously easy for one to get a purloined social security number, the government has no meaningful way of tracking this activity, and penalties to employers for hiring illegals are nonexistant and nonenforced), there will be no closing of the floodgates.
It's 4:30 am and I suppose I don't have any reason for posting this other than providing an absurdity/reality check for those who think that border enforcement is the 'answer' to illegal immigration (especially with the foxes frequently guarding the henhouse, as it were ;) ), or amnesty is, for that matter and thought people might be interested in hearing about/discussing it in light of the most recent abomination of an immigration bill dying in the Senate.
Regards,
Nydia
Three National Guard servicemen, sent down here as part of the 'surge' in border enforcement, were arrested with twenty-eight(!) illegal immigrants in an official van, in a sting last month - they were indicted today and the incident finally published to the local papers here. They were only caught because they had been shuttling illegals through the I-35 checkpoint for at least two months, taking them from Laredo to Cotulla or San Antonio; when one was working at the checkpoint, one of the others would bring the van through the service lane and pretend to be discussing official business, or bringing lunch, to him, and then go on through without inspection.
Getting *into* Laredo via one of its five international bridges is trivial, as foot and motor traffic of thousands of Mexican nationals occurs every day as part of everyday life in our single city separated by an international border; but even felons and other other undesirables can skirt scrutiny by getting someone to smuggle them through Customs via a similar arrangement (and occasionally Customs agents are busted for this as well, but more often for allowing drugs across).
Unfortunately, the SA Express-News doesn't have the article posted, but I did find something from the Houston paper online regarding yesterday's indictment:
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/4943122.html
Some details of how the transactions went down, including excerpts of the text messages, the three officers were exchanging, can be found in the Ft. Worth Star Telegram initial report on the arrests:
http://www.star-telegram.com/news/story/133693.html
The three soldiers used cell phone text messaging to negotiate the details, price and number of people who would be smuggled north, according to a complaint filed in court Monday."tell them ill only do 1 run @ no more than 20 people @ $150 a person and i want 2 leave @ 1930 hrs and ill go 2 San Anto if they want," Torres typed to Hodge hours before Torres was arrested, according to the complaint.
A message later that day from Pacheco instructed Torres that a trip was a go, with a promised payment of $3,500 for the delivery of 24 illegal immigrants, the document said.
"24 will b tuff 2 fit but ill try," Torres wrote in response, the complaint said.
More interesting is the additional information included in the Austin American-Statesman in the initial report on the arrests:
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/06/13/13texasimmig.html
Such arrests weren't isolated cases. Since the 2004 fiscal year, according to the inspector general's office in the Homeland Security Department, 282 employees of Customs and Border Protection working on the border from California to Texas have been investigated for corruption, 52 of them this year, compared with 66 for all of last year.
Considering that the overwhelming majority of enforcement personnel stationed here at the border hail from the border region themselves (which tends to have a sanguine attitude with regard to illegal immigration, many residents having family on both sides of the border), and that politics and city managements down here tend to be modelled on the 'patron' system and highly corrupt, this comes as little surprise - I've frequently remarked that we have such a high proportion of the population in some branch of law enforcement that *everyone* is either on one side or other of the law - and often within the same family :).
I believe I also mentioned a while back that the 'fence' that Mr. Chertoff and his lackeys posed in front of, and which is going in down here, is a total joke - laughably flimsy and they're not even clearing the brush in front of them :). While I wholeheartedly support *sincere* efforts to increase interdiction at the border, it also seems quite clear that such efforts are going to be largely ineffectual as long as there are such incentives for people to migrate across - no matter how much we spend on border enforcement, as long as the risk vs reward for people once they have arrived here is minimal (as previously mentioned, it's ridiculously easy for one to get a purloined social security number, the government has no meaningful way of tracking this activity, and penalties to employers for hiring illegals are nonexistant and nonenforced), there will be no closing of the floodgates.
It's 4:30 am and I suppose I don't have any reason for posting this other than providing an absurdity/reality check for those who think that border enforcement is the 'answer' to illegal immigration (especially with the foxes frequently guarding the henhouse, as it were ;) ), or amnesty is, for that matter and thought people might be interested in hearing about/discussing it in light of the most recent abomination of an immigration bill dying in the Senate.
Regards,
Nydia