Kelraz Bladesinger
05-18-2008, 06:17 PM
Curious how much play this has gotten outside of DC. The Smithsonian Institute, paid for in full with taxpayer money, has recently licensed its contents out to the private Showtime network. Through this they created the Smithsonian Network as well as a number of Showtime videos using Smithsonian's content. Should a private company be able to profit from our public treasures? Or is it a good thing that there's a company out there to "manage" it for us and to provide us with the Smithsonian Network and the various other mediums?
http://dcartsjobs.blogspot.com/2006/04/news-smithsonian-film-deal-stirs.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/01/arts/television/01smit.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
I know the story is somewhat old, though refreshed in my mind as I was asked to shoot some behind the scenes work tomorrow. Apparently The Smithsonian, for the first time ever, is allowing a feature film "Night at the Museum 2" to shoot on their premises and Showtime most certainly is getting a pretty hefty cut. Since we didn't discuss it the first time around, and its bound to pop back up in the news over the next few weeks, what's everyone's thoughts?
http://dcartsjobs.blogspot.com/2006/04/news-smithsonian-film-deal-stirs.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/01/arts/television/01smit.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
I know the story is somewhat old, though refreshed in my mind as I was asked to shoot some behind the scenes work tomorrow. Apparently The Smithsonian, for the first time ever, is allowing a feature film "Night at the Museum 2" to shoot on their premises and Showtime most certainly is getting a pretty hefty cut. Since we didn't discuss it the first time around, and its bound to pop back up in the news over the next few weeks, what's everyone's thoughts?