Re-reading a great book By Ted Nudgent. Ted, White and Blue The Nudget Manifesto. great read.


Did the crayons come with that book or did you have to buy them separately?

Did the crayons come with that book or did you have to buy them separately?


LOL probably separetly because that sort of "inclusion" doesnt fit well with the Chinese/Wal-mart business model.

Altough i'm fairly certain the crayon's came with a sharpener imbeded into the box. the real question here is can Osg comprehend that they work best using either a consistant clockwise or counter clockwise motion....awww hell i gotta run i'll have to explain that to you later.

in the mean time i suggest you lick your crayons frequently as human saliva makes the them apply colour more vividly and easily. no worries Bro as chinese officials work very hard to ensure that all products sent to the USA are 100% lead free.

Heh, and I thought the personal attacks were supposed to stop....

No that's only amongst your selfs.. I am apperantly free game. More mod hypocrisy. hardly surprising.

Just think of it as the mods are the Good Ole Boy's and you are a minority with Jedd. Its ok for you guys to get slammed, but dont let one of them get attacked or they threat, ban, and/or edit your sig.

Osgiliath means pinata in Latin.

Osgiliath means pinata in Spanish.

Fixed for humor :P

Correct me if i'm wrong . but Ll's, lumm and my post while bieng full on jabs and pokes with the intention of both humor and ridicule dont qualify as personal attacks.

If i post F you mutha F'er, you POS Cck Sucker Azzhole Cum guzzling dildo licking used douche bag drinking ignoramous. that would be personal attack right?

While not as overt, indicating that someone who reads a book you don't happen to agree with being on par with a child that uses crayons to color with, isn't exactly as benign as you might think.

Disagreeing with the book and the ideas it puts forth is fine, but ridiculing the person that reads it is crossing the line into personal attacks, IMHO.

http://www.after5catalog.com/images/products/444-07001b1.jpg

Correct me if i'm wrong . but Ll's, lumm and my post while bieng full on jabs and pokes with the intention of both humor and ridicule dont qualify as personal attacks.

If i post F you mutha F'er, you POS Cck Sucker Azzhole Cum guzzling dildo licking used douche bag drinking ignoramous. that would be personal attack right?


A personal attack is a direct assault. L2 simply asked a question much like this: Sixe, are stupid attacks a regular occurrence for you or is it just something that happens if you post here? Also note for purposes of an example I didn't use the name of any regular poster here so as not to possibly offend anyone.

You see, that is a question and not an attack. It is simply natural human curiosity that we are born with. Now something like "I hate Liberal Scum" that is part of a persons avatar would be a personal attack as there are many here who could be called liberal.

You see, that is a question and not an attack. It is simply natural human curiosity that we are born with. Now something like "I hate Liberal Scum" that is part of a persons avatar would be a personal attack as there are many here who could be called liberal.

I have a million other whippy little sayings I'd like to put there but I can't for the life of me figure out how to change it or how I got it there in the first place. It's been to long.

A personal attack is a direct assault. L2 simply asked a question much like this: Sixe, are stupid attacks a regular occurrence for you or is it just something that happens if you post here? Also note for purposes of an example I didn't use the name of any regular poster here so as not to possibly offend anyone.

You see, that is a question and not an attack. It is simply natural human curiosity that we are born with. Now something like "I hate Liberal Scum" that is part of a persons avatar would be a personal attack as there are many here who could be called liberal.

Rover, inference can be used as a personal attack. Using your logic, I would be able to post Rober, did your mother have any children that lived? and not expect to be called out on a personal attack. Please note I did not use the name of any regular poster so as not to offend anyone. It's just simple, natural curiosity that we are all born with, so I would be exempt from any claim of personal attack.

Also, while there are many that are considered Liberal on this board, if you also consider yourself scum, you probably have self image issues. If someone were to post I hate conservative scum!!! I would not be offended, as I do not consider myself scum. You might want to get therapy if you think so badly of yourself....

Yes Sixee, questions are just that...questions...and they sure are fun. I'm not sure what you mean by inference? Would this be an example:

Sixe, would being a complete idiot have anything to do with your mothers genetics or is it something you could have possibly worked hard at?

Now I think I see what you mean by inference, this could be a double inference. The first could be that someone who is named Sixe has a mother who was/is genetically pre-disposed to being an idiot and that gene could be perhaps passed on or it could mean that someone named Sixe actually tries to be an idiot through hard work.

Thanks for helping me clear up the inference question you posed.

No problem Rover. A further example of inference would be something along the lines of posting insults about a poster, but changing one letter of the name to make it seem fictitious.

Posting something like:
Rober, if I had a dog that looked like you, I'd shave its rear end and teach it to walk backwards. is an example.

Note how closely the name in the ficticious insult closely resembles your's. I'll give you a hint. Its the 3rd letter of the name.

It's ok, you don't need to thank me. I'm just glad I could point out things that so obviously escaped your generally meticulous nature.

No problem Rover. A further example of inference would be something along the lines of posting insults about a poster, but changing one letter of the name to make it seem fictitious.

Posting something like:
is an example.

Note how closely the name in the ficticious insult closely resembles your's. I'll give you a hint. Its the 3rd letter of the name.

It's ok, you don't need to thank me. I'm just glad I could point out things that so obviously escaped your generally meticulous nature.

Hmmm...I just don't see that and I'm not aware of any members named Rober. I do see you borrowed something from a MASH episode:

if I had a dog that looked like you, I'd shave its rear end and teach it to walk backwards.

That however is probably copyright infrigement.

Sorry Rover, I forgot to add my tags to my previous post.

But since we aren't talking about an actual post, would copyright infringement apply?

Also, don't jokes fall under the category of blues musical rifts? After a while, they become communal property, and copyright infringment becomes moot?

Are you girls seriously having an in-depth argument about how you can best passive aggressively nag each other?

Girls? From a MODERATOR? Will you now ban yourself for 2 days? :rolleyes:
Some of the 'girls' on this board might take umbrage with equating our behavior with thier gender. Nydia, lock and load!

As for the passive-aggressive part of your post, I will apologize for not adding my tags to my one post. Rover obviously thought I was serious when I posted about the fake names. That's why I went back and edited it.

Are you girls seriously having an in-depth argument about how you can best passive aggressively nag each other?


OMG...girls...I get it...only girls argue...I'm telling Nydia on you...no no one arguing...Just asking questions.

Girls? From a MODERATOR? Will you now ban yourself for 2 days? :rolleyes:
Some of the 'girls' on this board might take umbrage with equating our behavior with thier gender. Nydia, lock and load!

As for the passive-aggressive part of your post, I will apologize for not adding my tags to my one post. Rover obviously thought I was serious when I posted about the fake names. That's why I went back and edited it.


Wait...you were not serious about fake names? Does that mean you were actually insulting me? I take fake names very seriously....kind of like if lets say...someone named Sixe was known to take fake news seriously like on Foxx news and then post about it here thereby showing that genetic predisposition to idiocy. Like that?

You might have a point, if a person resembling the actions in your post had done that recently.
However, looking through the posters on this site, I see nothing from a user listed as Sixe, nor Foxx news.

I do see a few references about Fox News. I also see somewhat of a resemblance between my name and the fake name in your post. Fortunately, since I haven't watched that particular news agency in years, I'm not offended in the least.

Unlike you and the 'Liberal Scum' tag you got all hot and bothered about....

Sixee, your [sarcasm] tags arent working, you can see the actual tags in the post.

How did you know I was hot and bothered...was it my rapid breating followed by moaning as I...never mind...do you have a web cam that is watching me?


I keep looking and I don't see any similiarity you silly...your name is spelled with ee not with one.

I know you got all hot and bothered by it because my monitor on this end got all fogged up. 'you silly'? Are you a fan of the most unpopular of the 3 Stooges, Joe? The only people I hear using that particularly flamboyant phrase were caricatures of homosexuals in 1940's and 1950's movies. So, perhaps 'girls' fits you more that I first thought?

I know you got all hot and bothered by it because my monitor on this end got all fogged up. 'you silly'? Are you a fan of the most unpopular of the 3 Stooges, Joe? The only people I hear using that particularly flamboyant phrase were caricatures of homosexuals in 1940's and 1950's movies. So, perhaps 'girls' fits you more that I first thought?


See what I mean...you can see the actual tags...maybe you could PM Sanchek and have him look at it.

It's because of the Obama-loving moderators that they aren't working. Must be more of the 'change' that was promised

Fucking hell guys, stop this passive-aggressive shit, grow some balls, and come out and flame the shit out of eachother - otherwise just get on with being all nice and inside the 'rules'.

(don't count on fair banning moderation, for christsake)

we have a establish allowed flame though mocking your actual sex is allowable.

Fucking hell guys, stop this passive-aggressive shit, grow some balls, and come out and flame the shit out of eachother - otherwise just get on with being all nice and inside the 'rules'.

(don't count on fair banning moderation, for christsake)


Sometime when the point is to be annoying...stuff like this is a far better way to go. And really Sixee isn't a bad guy...it's that Sixe guy who is the total fucking retard useless piece of shit who has his head so far up his own ass he bruises his brain everytime he flaps his thin lips.

Rover you were trying to be annoying? Here I was thinking I was actually helping you to understand a fine subtlety of the Intertubes, and you were just toying with me.:(
Shocked! I tell you I am shocked!

And Rover isn't all that bad, either. When Rober, comes out here and acts like a petulant 3 year old who has not taken his ADD medication, frothing at the mouth and flinging poo at people that disagree with his view of the world it makes this board, a sadder place indeed.

Sometime when the point is to be annoying...stuff like this is a far better way to go. And really Sixee isn't a bad guy...it's that Sixe guy who is the total fucking retard useless piece of shit who has his head so far up his own ass he bruises his brain everytime he flaps his thin lips.

When the point is to be annoying you should delete your post before you hit the "Submit Reply" button.

Also, L2's post was obviously talking shit about the book. Ya'll need to calm the fuck down.

When the point is to be annoying you should delete your post before you hit the "Submit Reply" button.

Also, L2's post was obviously talking shit about the book. Ya'll need to calm the fuck down.

Please refer to other posts about logic and its banning from posts please.