|
|
#1 |
|
Master of Squirrels
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 190
vCash: 1000
|
I am looking for some recommendations on which proc to go with for mine and my wifes new machines.
AMD 64 AMD 64X2 Intel 3.2 Etc. I plan on running XP or 2k3 server on the boxes, and plan on playing Vanguard: Saga of Heroes and FEAR on it. Thanks for any suggestions. Rev. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Don't Piss off the BULL.
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 2,406
vCash: 1000
|
AMD 64 dual core~! At least thats what I would get out of that list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Advocate of Mayhem
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Party: N/A
Posts: 5,465
vCash: 1500
|
If money were no object I agree with Ibudin. I like how the mboards for AMD arch are cheap but damn their processors are pricey
![]() There are some decently priced older techs/archs out there that still perform quite well. What's your price range?
__________________
Nurta <Shark Baby> Mind Trick - Empire |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Master of Squirrels
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 190
vCash: 1000
|
I am planning on spending about 1k on the motherboard, proc, ram and a case. I have all the other pieces I need. I could even get away without the ram and case, but my server is in serious need of an upgrade. My only concern with the X2 is that most programs I have seen cant take advantage of it due to OS limitations.
Rev |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Administrator
Joined: Jan 2001
Location: Atlanta
Party: Independent
Posts: 7,685
vCash: 900
|
Even though not many single programs take advantage of dual core, it's still really nice to have. If you're running a single task, that means you can devote 100% of one CPU to it and all of the various background processes on your machine will be balanced onto the other core.
When you get to doing a couple things at once, the advantage is even more pronounced. If you're buying right now, I'd get the x2. Performance is comparable, but they run cooler. If you can wait, I'd get one of the new Intel Conroe chips. Initial samples of them blow AMD chips away in every possible metric you can compare. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Advocate of Mayhem
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Party: N/A
Posts: 5,465
vCash: 1500
|
Any idea how much those new Intel chips are going to run price wise? I noticed Dell is coming out with some new Extreme gaming system and are featuring those procs and the new nVidia cards with the multiple GPUs on them. God, if I didn't have a family and a new mortgage....../shudder
I'd be all over it ![]()
__________________
Nurta <Shark Baby> Mind Trick - Empire |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Needs more beta testing!
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,440
vCash: 1000
|
Hehe, Computer Store person time!
To be honest, when you balance mobo and processor cost, AMD tends to be the better performer. This is coming from a recently converted Intel freak too. ![]() It really depends on the system you're looking to build. I was originally going to go with an Athlong 64 X2 3800+, however I sat down and thought about all the things I'd be doing with that second processor, which ended up being very little. Right now there are not a whole lot of programs that truly utilize Dual Core CPU's. Granted this is going to change within the next 6 months to a year, but by that time AMD and Intel have promised us the new Quad Core CPU's, so I wouldn't really sweat getting an X2 unless you plan on encoding DVD's with DVD Shrink while playing games or doing graphics work. I ended up going with an AMD Athlon 3500+ Socket 939. For what I use my computer for (Games, Email, Games, Internet, Games, Games and more Games), it's all I really need. I put that on the ASUS A8N-E motherboard (SLI is nice but a second vid card in the house would have signed my divorce papers ^_^). I went with a Sapphire X800 GTO Fireblade Edition graphics card. Yes, I know, NVidia is better, but the cost vs performance was too good to resist. I went with 2 X Geil 1 GB RAM kits (2 X 512 per kit). With a 2.5 Cache latency, it gives me plenty to work with. For a hard drive I went with a 250 GB SATA II Western Digital. It's not a Raptor, but it's not bad either with 3GB/S transfer rates. For a case and power supply, I spent a little extra and went with an Antec NeoPower 480W and an Antec P180. The power supply is probably one of the best ever made, has a steady rate of power and really responds well to full load. Maximum PC gave it a 10 (Kick Ass) rating. The P180 is my favorite because it's functional. It's not bad looking either, but mainly because of how it's laid out. I won't get into details, but feel free to check it out at www.antec.com and prepare to be amazed. (*Edit* Case is laid out great, but takes a little work to put together, but is WELL worth the effort) I was so terrified of overheating (old stories of AMD's die hard, now the Intel LGA775 socket processors run hotter than AMD) that I made sure I had enough cooling. In addition to the cases 3 X 120mm fans, I added another 120mm fan and an 80mm fan. For an optical drive I put in a 16X DVD-RW Dual Layer Lite On Burner. To be honest, unless you're looking at Plextor or Pioneer, they're all pretty much the same quality wise, it just happened to be in the shop at the time. Hope this helps some. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Administrator
Joined: Jan 2001
Location: Atlanta
Party: Independent
Posts: 7,685
vCash: 900
|
Quote:
The way they rocked the AMD chips was unreal though. The 2.66ghz one beat an overclocked FX-60 by a large margin on media encoding and synthetic benchmarks. Will be interesting to see if thorough testing shows the same thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Resident Angry Veteran
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: The North Pole
Party: Independent
Posts: 1,133
vCash: 1000
|
I'd go with the AMD64 x2
I have one, used to have a 3400+ not huge difference in your average stuff, but if youre using server on it, I'd definitely suggest it cause I can play WoW, or BF2, and rip DVDs at the same time without a big performance hit. (for back up only .. *cough*) |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Master of Squirrels
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 190
vCash: 1000
|
shit elemak I just spit up Oatmeal on my keyboard when I read the (cough for backups) statement. Right now I am leaning towards the X2 4000 +, I have had both AMDs and Intel and have seen better performance from my AMD. Of course my wife burned hers up but I dont think it was the chip I think it was the spot she put her case in (IE no air flow). On the upside I am able to run FEAR right now, its a bit sluggish but I havent overclocked my current intel chip yet. So I think I am going to wait and see what the new Intel and AMD chips look like. Does anyone know the release date for Vanguard? And thanks for all the advice, I do like that case, but I am going to get a 500 watt PS for my new system.
Rev |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|